User talk:Lidnariq: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Account problem contact) |
Rainwarrior (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Look how quickly and easily it was reverted, and it didn't need an administrator's help. After you noticed vandalism, it took you three clicks to remove it: diff, undo, save. Then compare to how much work an administrator needed to do to get someone's account set up properly under the trusted/role account system. Also notice the lack of a working link to the vandal's web site because the editor couldn't solve the NES trivia question that the wiki presents to someone new who adds an external link. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 22:09, 12 October 2012 (MDT) | Look how quickly and easily it was reverted, and it didn't need an administrator's help. After you noticed vandalism, it took you three clicks to remove it: diff, undo, save. Then compare to how much work an administrator needed to do to get someone's account set up properly under the trusted/role account system. Also notice the lack of a working link to the vandal's web site because the editor couldn't solve the NES trivia question that the wiki presents to someone new who adds an external link. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 22:09, 12 October 2012 (MDT) | ||
:Thank you for your help in fighting vandalism. But I've noticed a peculiar sentiment in the edit summaries for your reverts. Without anonymous edits, how would you recommend contacting someone in case of problems creating an account on or logging in to the forum or wiki? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 14:36, 19 February 2013 (MST) | :Thank you for your help in fighting vandalism. But I've noticed a peculiar sentiment in the edit summaries for your reverts. Without anonymous edits, how would you recommend contacting someone in case of problems creating an account on or logging in to the forum or wiki? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 14:36, 19 February 2013 (MST) | ||
::What if anonymous edits were allowed on one special talk page in particular? Users who are not logged in could be redirected there or given a link to it automatically if they try to make an edit. The entire wiki-talk doesn't need to be an emergency messageboard. - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 00:29, 20 February 2013 (MST) | |||
Revision as of 07:29, 20 February 2013
Leaving anonymous edits open
In this revert, you asked: "Are we sure about leaving anonymous edits open?"
Look how quickly and easily it was reverted, and it didn't need an administrator's help. After you noticed vandalism, it took you three clicks to remove it: diff, undo, save. Then compare to how much work an administrator needed to do to get someone's account set up properly under the trusted/role account system. Also notice the lack of a working link to the vandal's web site because the editor couldn't solve the NES trivia question that the wiki presents to someone new who adds an external link. --Tepples 22:09, 12 October 2012 (MDT)
- Thank you for your help in fighting vandalism. But I've noticed a peculiar sentiment in the edit summaries for your reverts. Without anonymous edits, how would you recommend contacting someone in case of problems creating an account on or logging in to the forum or wiki? --Tepples (talk) 14:36, 19 February 2013 (MST)
- What if anonymous edits were allowed on one special talk page in particular? Users who are not logged in could be redirected there or given a link to it automatically if they try to make an edit. The entire wiki-talk doesn't need to be an emergency messageboard. - Rainwarrior (talk) 00:29, 20 February 2013 (MST)
