User talk:Zzo38: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→.org.org: I will fix offline HTML but need clarification on "entirely different sites") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I do know what protocol-relative URIs are. However, it seems to me that if the protocol is FILE then it might not work (unless MediaWiki takes care of that on the server-side; also that they shouldn't be used between two entirely different sites)...but that is your page and you can fix how you want it to do. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 09:37, 18 August 2015 (MDT) | :I do know what protocol-relative URIs are. However, it seems to me that if the protocol is FILE then it might not work (unless MediaWiki takes care of that on the server-side; also that they shouldn't be used between two entirely different sites)...but that is your page and you can fix how you want it to do. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 09:37, 18 August 2015 (MDT) | ||
::You have a good point about <code>file:</code> breakage. The next "Offline HTML version" will transform protocol-relative URLs into <code>http:</code> URLs. As for the rule "they shouldn't be used between two entirely different sites", is there an RFC or other spec documenting this? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 12:45, 18 August 2015 (MDT) | ::You have a good point about <code>file:</code> breakage. The next "Offline HTML version" will transform protocol-relative URLs into <code>http:</code> URLs. As for the rule "they shouldn't be used between two entirely different sites", is there an RFC or other spec documenting this? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 12:45, 18 August 2015 (MDT) | ||
:::I don't know; ignore me if I am wrong. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 10:40, 19 August 2015 (MDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:40, 19 August 2015
.org.org
Thanks for fixing the accidental .org.org in the link to my ATT user page. I must have had CNET syndrome that day.
FYI: What you saw beginning with [//allthetropes was called a "protocol-relative link". If you follow a protocol-relative link from an http: page, it'll connect to the other server with http:, and if you do so from an https: page, it'll connect to the other server with http:. See mediawikiwiki:MediaWiki 1.18#Protocol-relative URLs. --Tepples (talk) 14:51, 16 August 2015 (MDT)
- I do know what protocol-relative URIs are. However, it seems to me that if the protocol is FILE then it might not work (unless MediaWiki takes care of that on the server-side; also that they shouldn't be used between two entirely different sites)...but that is your page and you can fix how you want it to do. --Zzo38 (talk) 09:37, 18 August 2015 (MDT)
- You have a good point about
file:breakage. The next "Offline HTML version" will transform protocol-relative URLs intohttp:URLs. As for the rule "they shouldn't be used between two entirely different sites", is there an RFC or other spec documenting this? --Tepples (talk) 12:45, 18 August 2015 (MDT)
- You have a good point about
