Talk:Program compatibility: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Passive-aggressive?) |
Rainwarrior (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Passive-aggressive == | == Passive-aggressive == | ||
How is this any more passive-aggressive than [[Game bugs]]? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 18:16, 28 July 2015 (MDT) | How is this any more passive-aggressive than [[Game bugs]]? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 18:16, 28 July 2015 (MDT) | ||
:It's passive-aggressive because you have a direct way of dealing with the problem that raydempsey had a bug in his ''in-development game''. I think it's quite rude to put it on a list like this given the situation. He's still working on it! Your edit said "[http://wiki.nesdev.org/w/index.php?title=Program_compatibility&diff=11335&oldid=9718 namin' and shamin']", I presume as a joke, but I think it's an accurate description of what it was effectively doing. This is completely different than enumerating bugs in long-dead software by people who are not members of this community. | |||
:Yes, you did let him know directly on the board. That part was good. In light of this your actions weren't passive-aggressive as a whole. I was really just referring to the act of putting up a public notice about someone's bug, which by itself is a rather rude and passive-aggressive way of telling them to fix their software. | |||
:The other entries on the list are probably fine/useful. - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 21:21, 28 July 2015 (MDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:21, 29 July 2015
Passive-aggressive
How is this any more passive-aggressive than Game bugs? --Tepples (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2015 (MDT)
- It's passive-aggressive because you have a direct way of dealing with the problem that raydempsey had a bug in his in-development game. I think it's quite rude to put it on a list like this given the situation. He's still working on it! Your edit said "namin' and shamin'", I presume as a joke, but I think it's an accurate description of what it was effectively doing. This is completely different than enumerating bugs in long-dead software by people who are not members of this community.
- Yes, you did let him know directly on the board. That part was good. In light of this your actions weren't passive-aggressive as a whole. I was really just referring to the act of putting up a public notice about someone's bug, which by itself is a rather rude and passive-aggressive way of telling them to fix their software.
- The other entries on the list are probably fine/useful. - Rainwarrior (talk) 21:21, 28 July 2015 (MDT)
