Talk:CPU addressing modes: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Phrasing doesn't match table: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Should be modified to match the declaration pattern in the proceeding table, as follows: | Should be modified to match the declaration pattern in the proceeding table, as follows: | ||
"The (d,y''')''' mode is used far more often than (d,x)." | "The (d,y''')''' mode is used far more often than (d,x)." --SirGouki | ||
: There is no (d,y) mode. —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 11:48, 22 April 2021 (MDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:48, 22 April 2021
(d),y addressing typo
For (d),y adressing, shouldn't the formula be:
PEEK(PEEK(arg) + (PEEK((arg + 1) % 256) * 256) + y)
instead of
PEEK(PEEK(arg) + PEEK((arg + 1) % 256) + y)
?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.23.206.197 (talk • contribs)
- Yes. Amended. - Rainwarrior (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2016 (MST)
Phrasing doesn't match table
The line:
"The (d),y mode is used far more often than (d,x)."
Should be modified to match the declaration pattern in the proceeding table, as follows:
"The (d,y) mode is used far more often than (d,x)." --SirGouki
