Talk:VRC6: Difference between revisions
(should share my data) |
Rainwarrior (talk | contribs) (→VRC6 and $B003 bit 5: internet archive didn't help) |
||
(26 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
(Thus, values from $80-$BF are from ROM and values from $40-$7F are from RAM. Other values are not present (fortunately) —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 17:57, 23 January 2014 (MST) | (Thus, values from $80-$BF are from ROM and values from $40-$7F are from RAM. Other values are not present (fortunately) —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 17:57, 23 January 2014 (MST) | ||
:If this table is correct, "For the pattern tables, when the $20s bit of $B003 is set, 2 KiB banks pass PPU A10 through (limiting the register to seven bits wide by ignoring the LSB)" is wrong; it doesn't ignore the LSB of the register. (I have written a QBASIC program to follow the rules mentioned in the article, and it matches this table only if you ignore that rule.) --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 03:07, 10 February 2014 (MST) | |||
:: Please point out which line(s) you feel contradict(s) the assertion of the article—[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 11:13, 10 February 2014 (MST) | |||
The following QBASIC program gives output matching the table above: | |||
<pre> | |||
DEFINT A-Z | |||
DATA &H01,&H08,&H10,&H19,&H20,&H29,&H31,&H38 | |||
DIM R(0 TO 7), O(0 TO 11) | |||
DEF FNHEX$ (X) = RIGHT$("0" + HEX$(X), 2) + " " | |||
FOR I = 0 TO 7 | |||
READ R(I) | |||
NEXT I | |||
OPEN "VRC6BANK.OUT" FOR OUTPUT AS #1 | |||
PRINT #1, "b003 0000 0400 0800 0c00 1000 1400 1800 1c00 2000 2400 2800 2c00 " | |||
FOR V = 0 TO &H3F | |||
SELECT CASE V AND 7 | |||
CASE 0, 4 | |||
FOR I = 0 TO 7 | |||
O(I) = R(I) | |||
NEXT I | |||
IF V AND 4 THEN | |||
O(8) = R(6) | |||
O(9) = R(7) | |||
O(10) = R(6) | |||
O(11) = R(7) | |||
ELSE | |||
O(8) = R(6) | |||
O(9) = R(6) | |||
O(10) = R(7) | |||
O(11) = R(7) | |||
END IF | |||
CASE 1, 5 | |||
O(0) = R(0) | |||
O(1) = R(0) | |||
O(2) = R(1) | |||
O(3) = R(1) | |||
O(4) = R(2) | |||
O(5) = R(2) | |||
O(6) = R(3) | |||
O(7) = R(3) | |||
O(8) = R(4) | |||
O(9) = R(5) | |||
O(10) = R(6) | |||
O(11) = R(7) | |||
CASE 2, 3 | |||
O(0) = R(0) | |||
O(1) = R(1) | |||
O(2) = R(2) | |||
O(3) = R(3) | |||
O(4) = R(4) | |||
O(5) = R(4) | |||
O(6) = R(5) | |||
O(7) = R(5) | |||
O(8) = R(6) | |||
O(9) = R(7) | |||
O(10) = R(6) | |||
O(11) = R(7) | |||
CASE 6, 7 | |||
O(0) = R(0) | |||
O(1) = R(1) | |||
O(2) = R(2) | |||
O(3) = R(3) | |||
O(4) = R(4) | |||
O(5) = R(4) | |||
O(6) = R(5) | |||
O(7) = R(5) | |||
O(8) = R(6) | |||
O(9) = R(6) | |||
O(10) = R(7) | |||
O(11) = R(7) | |||
END SELECT | |||
FOR I = 0 TO 7 | |||
O(I) = O(I) OR &H80 | |||
' *** The following line is the one I mean *** | |||
IF V AND &H20 AND ((V AND 3) = 1 OR (I > 3 AND (V AND 2) = 2)) THEN O(I) = (O(I) AND &HFE) OR (I AND 1) | |||
NEXT I | |||
FOR I = 8 TO 11 | |||
IF V AND &H10 THEN O(I) = O(I) OR &H80 ELSE O(I) = O(I) OR &H40 | |||
NEXT I | |||
IF V AND &H20 THEN | |||
FOR I = 8 TO 11 | |||
SELECT CASE V AND 15 | |||
CASE 0, 7 | |||
O(I) = O(I) AND &HFE | |||
IF I AND 1 THEN O(I) = O(I) OR 1 | |||
CASE 4, 3 | |||
O(I) = O(I) AND &HFE | |||
IF I AND 2 THEN O(I) = O(I) OR 1 | |||
CASE 8, 15 | |||
O(I) = O(I) AND &HFE | |||
CASE 12, 11 | |||
O(I) = O(I) OR 1 | |||
END SELECT | |||
NEXT I | |||
END IF | |||
PRINT #1, FNHEX$(V); | |||
FOR I = 0 TO 11 | |||
PRINT #1, FNHEX$(O(I)); | |||
NEXT I | |||
PRINT #1, | |||
NEXT V | |||
CLOSE | |||
</pre> | |||
But maybe I have made another mistake in this program, which I haven't noticed. It seems to be the same as meaning, it only passes PPU A10 through if the register is used for multiple 1K banks. Perhaps this is what is actually meant by the article text, although it is a bit unclear (maybe it should say, "2 KiB banks (i.e. if one register is used twice) pass PPU A10 through", but I wait for your advice on this). --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 12:35, 10 February 2014 (MST) | |||
== Which emulator support? == | |||
Can you please tell me which emulator support all of the features of the $B003 register of VRC6? --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (MST) | |||
: None (as of the time I signed this). Having a test ROM is probably a prerequisite. —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 17:58, 9 February 2014 (MST) | |||
::Someone who has a VRC6 cartridge could try to do it, perhaps. (I may be able to write a test ROM myself, but it won't be useful (at least at first) since I have no way of testing it, although perhaps the results could be compared with the table above as a kind of partial testing.) Furthermore, what are PPU addresses $3xxx mapped to on VRC6? --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 02:10, 10 February 2014 (MST) | |||
::: There's no justifiable reason to care what PPU addresses $3xxx are mapped to, and so we did not measure. —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 11:13, 10 February 2014 (MST) | |||
::::I am one that does care. It would be necessary, if someone tries to write a program to access $3000 in PPU, and then you have to know how to emulate such a thing (maybe it is the same as $2xxx, which is what it is when no extra logic is controlling it, but I don't know). --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 12:35, 10 February 2014 (MST) | |||
: I just the $b003 features to bizhawk, but given how weird they are, and the fact that there are no ROMs that actually used them, I couldn't say that they work for sure without a test ROM. [[User:Natt|Natt]] ([[User talk:Natt|talk]]) 11:53, 15 February 2014 (MST) | |||
::The implementation at [http://code.google.com/p/bizhawk/source/browse/trunk/quicknes/nes_emu/Mapper_Vrc6.cpp] appears to be incomplete. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 13:19, 15 February 2014 (MST) | |||
:::That's for the quicknes core, which we're going to offer as a speedier (but less accurate) alternate. The Bizhawk Original core is the one I was referring to: [http://code.google.com/p/bizhawk/source/browse/trunk/BizHawk.Emulation.Cores/Consoles/Nintendo/NES/Boards/VRC6.cs] [[User:Natt|Natt]] ([[User talk:Natt|talk]]) 15:20, 15 February 2014 (MST) | |||
::::Ah, OK, thank you, I didn't know that. It looks OK to me (but I don't know C# programming very well). --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 22:59, 15 February 2014 (MST) | |||
: Here's a test rom. Bizhawk (latest SVN) passes it, FCEUX fails predictably. It shouldn't be considered accurate until it's been run on actual VRC6 hardware. Also, it's the first thing I've ever written for NES, so who knows what's broken on it. [https://www.mediafire.com/?6hvuj53omv8y3fn] [[User:Natt|Natt]] ([[User talk:Natt|talk]]) 13:57, 16 February 2014 (MST) | |||
== SRAM at $6000-$7FFF ? == | |||
The document makes a reference to a PRG RAM enable flag at bit 7 of register $B003. Perhaps an entry for it should be added in the Banks section. At least one game (Madara) seems to rely on reading/writing to this region to maintain save points, so it would be reasonable to conclude that this region is not volatile PRG RAM but SRAM. It is also unclear what happens with SRAM when PRG RAM flag is not set - are writes to SRAM ignored and reads return open bus? {{unsigned|Colinvella}} | |||
: Plain iNES1 headers cannot specify whether a game has PRG RAM that is ''not'' battery backed. And unfortunately NesCartDB is currently down so I can't just say "X% of games have no PRG RAM, Y% have PRG RAM and no battery, Z% have at least one PRG RAM with a battery"... | |||
: PRG RAM that is not battery backed is just treated like the in-NES RAM: stays across warm boots, lost on a power cycle. | |||
: In any case, ''for the VRC6'', the two m26 games have battery-backed PRG RAM, and Akumajou Dracula has none. —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 23:42, 30 July 2016 (MDT) | |||
:: NEScartDB's contents indicate: Out of 1382 total games, 16.6% have a battery and 4.4% have external PRG RAM with no battery. —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 14:07, 25 October 2016 (MDT) | |||
== VRC6 and $B003 bit 5 == | |||
In the edit history comments: | |||
the specific banks used when bit 5 is clear are a function of banks 6 and 7, so you may end up with one-screen or "backwards" vertical instead, also - Lidnariq | |||
: Oh! I misunderstood when I said vertical was forced, I mistakenly thought PPU A10 was passed, not the internal register LSB. Isn't it arbitrary then, not just vertical/1-screen? - Rainwarrior | |||
:: Not fully arbitrary. If we're just talking about the standard 8 1 KiB banks mode (i.e. ([$B003] & 3) == 0), then you can get 1scA, 1scB, H, V, "backwards" H, and "backwards" V, depending on [$B003] & 4 and the specific lsbits of R6 and R7. | |||
:: Full arbitrary mirroring control only comes from using the modes where ([$B003] & 3) == 1 —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 17:29, 10 March 2018 (MST) | |||
::: So: arbitrary 2-nametable arrangements only in the most wasteful of all modes, where half your CHR is duplicated 1k pages? Would there ever be a good reason to leave bit 5 clear, or is it basically useless? - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 18:45, 10 March 2018 (MST) | |||
:::: Yeah, on the PCBs as designed, I honestly cannot figure out when one would ever leave bit 5 clear. I have to assume that the PCB of a game that used "mode $01" would have connected PPU A10 directly to the CHR. —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 19:13, 10 March 2018 (MST) | |||
: Bit 5 is left clear and used with Mode 1 when using 512 KiB CHR-ROM, by connecting VRC6's A10-A17 to CHR-ROM's A11-A18 and PPU's A10 to CHR-ROM's A10. There is no wasting of space for normal pattern data in this arrangement, but you are wasting half of each 2 KiB bank if you are using ROM nametables, as the last page of the Japanese VRC VI data sheet indicates. The current test ROM does not test that way of connecting the chip and thus may lead to false conclusions. [[User:NewRisingSun|NewRisingSun]] ([[User talk:NewRisingSun|talk]]) 19:39, 10 March 2018 (MST) | |||
:: Is the datasheet available somewhere? The first reference link on this article is now dead, unfortunately. - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 20:43, 10 March 2018 (MST) | |||
:: I try to use [https://web.archive.org/web/20160706191925/http://assemblergames.com/l/threads/several-famicom-nes-misc-dev-documents-from-nintendo-and-konami.48390/ the wayback machine] but while it has the forum thread archived, all of the documents are dead hotfile links. :( - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 20:46, 10 March 2018 (MST) |
Latest revision as of 03:46, 11 March 2018
Extended VRC6 PPU banking modes
The VRC6 documentation (currently linked from here) seems to indicate that register $B003 has quite a lot more bits than we currently know about:
- D0/D1: CHR/NT Bank mode
- mode 0 - normal
- mode 1 - regs 0-3 select 2KB CHR banks, regs 4-7 select nametable banks
- mode 2 - regs 0-3 select 1KB CHR banks at 0000-0FFF, regs 4-5 select 2KB CHR banks at 1000-1FFF, regs 6-7 select nametable banks (controlled by mirroring)
- mode 3 - pattern tables seemingly also get mapped into the nametables?
- D2/D3: mirroring control
- D4: 0 = Use extra 8KB CHR RAM for nametables (in bank modes 1-3); 1 = Use CHR ROM for nametables
- D5: something related to CHR ROM?
- D7: SRAM enable (1 = enable)
--Quietust (talk) 09:07, 23 October 2013 (MDT)
- That's funny- I noticed something related when I was reformatting up the VRC6 pinout page, pin 32.—Lidnariq (talk) 13:54, 23 October 2013 (MDT)
Raw data
Here's the raw data I received from BootGod that I used to determine the exact banking pattern of the VRC6:
b003 0000 0400 0800 0c00 1000 1400 1800 1c00 2000 2400 2800 2c00 00 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 71 71 78 78 01 81 81 88 88 90 90 99 99 60 69 71 78 02 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 71 78 71 78 03 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 71 78 71 78 04 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 71 78 71 78 05 81 81 88 88 90 90 99 99 60 69 71 78 06 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 71 71 78 78 07 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 71 71 78 78 08 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 71 71 78 78 09 81 81 88 88 90 90 99 99 60 69 71 78 0A 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 71 78 71 78 0B 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 71 78 71 78 0C 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 71 78 71 78 0D 81 81 88 88 90 90 99 99 60 69 71 78 0E 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 71 71 78 78 0F 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 71 71 78 78 10 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 B1 B1 B8 B8 11 81 81 88 88 90 90 99 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 12 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 B1 B8 B1 B8 13 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 B1 B8 B1 B8 14 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 B1 B8 B1 B8 15 81 81 88 88 90 90 99 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 16 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 B1 B1 B8 B8 17 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 B1 B1 B8 B8 18 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 B1 B1 B8 B8 19 81 81 88 88 90 90 99 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 1A 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 B1 B8 B1 B8 1B 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 B1 B8 B1 B8 1C 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 B1 B8 B1 B8 1D 81 81 88 88 90 90 99 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 1E 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 B1 B1 B8 B8 1F 81 88 90 99 A0 A0 A9 A9 B1 B1 B8 B8 20 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 70 71 78 79 21 80 81 88 89 90 91 98 99 60 69 71 78 22 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 71 78 71 78 23 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 70 78 71 79 24 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 70 78 71 79 25 80 81 88 89 90 91 98 99 60 69 71 78 26 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 71 71 78 78 27 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 70 71 78 79 28 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 70 70 78 78 29 80 81 88 89 90 91 98 99 60 69 71 78 2A 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 71 78 71 78 2B 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 71 79 71 79 2C 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 71 79 71 79 2D 80 81 88 89 90 91 98 99 60 69 71 78 2E 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 71 71 78 78 2F 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 70 70 78 78 30 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 B0 B1 B8 B9 31 80 81 88 89 90 91 98 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 32 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 B1 B8 B1 B8 33 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 B0 B8 B1 B9 34 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 B0 B8 B1 B9 35 80 81 88 89 90 91 98 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 36 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 B1 B1 B8 B8 37 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 B0 B1 B8 B9 38 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 B0 B0 B8 B8 39 80 81 88 89 90 91 98 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 3A 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 B1 B8 B1 B8 3B 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 B1 B9 B1 B9 3C 81 88 90 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 B1 B9 B1 B9 3D 80 81 88 89 90 91 98 99 A0 A9 B1 B8 3E 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 B1 B1 B8 B8 3F 81 88 90 99 A0 A1 A8 A9 B0 B0 B8 B8
The registers from D000 through E003 contained the pattern 01/08/10/19/20/29/31/38.
The $40s bit in this table is the CHRROM /OE. The $80s bit in this table is the CIRAM /OE.
(Thus, values from $80-$BF are from ROM and values from $40-$7F are from RAM. Other values are not present (fortunately) —Lidnariq (talk) 17:57, 23 January 2014 (MST)
- If this table is correct, "For the pattern tables, when the $20s bit of $B003 is set, 2 KiB banks pass PPU A10 through (limiting the register to seven bits wide by ignoring the LSB)" is wrong; it doesn't ignore the LSB of the register. (I have written a QBASIC program to follow the rules mentioned in the article, and it matches this table only if you ignore that rule.) --Zzo38 (talk) 03:07, 10 February 2014 (MST)
The following QBASIC program gives output matching the table above:
DEFINT A-Z DATA &H01,&H08,&H10,&H19,&H20,&H29,&H31,&H38 DIM R(0 TO 7), O(0 TO 11) DEF FNHEX$ (X) = RIGHT$("0" + HEX$(X), 2) + " " FOR I = 0 TO 7 READ R(I) NEXT I OPEN "VRC6BANK.OUT" FOR OUTPUT AS #1 PRINT #1, "b003 0000 0400 0800 0c00 1000 1400 1800 1c00 2000 2400 2800 2c00 " FOR V = 0 TO &H3F SELECT CASE V AND 7 CASE 0, 4 FOR I = 0 TO 7 O(I) = R(I) NEXT I IF V AND 4 THEN O(8) = R(6) O(9) = R(7) O(10) = R(6) O(11) = R(7) ELSE O(8) = R(6) O(9) = R(6) O(10) = R(7) O(11) = R(7) END IF CASE 1, 5 O(0) = R(0) O(1) = R(0) O(2) = R(1) O(3) = R(1) O(4) = R(2) O(5) = R(2) O(6) = R(3) O(7) = R(3) O(8) = R(4) O(9) = R(5) O(10) = R(6) O(11) = R(7) CASE 2, 3 O(0) = R(0) O(1) = R(1) O(2) = R(2) O(3) = R(3) O(4) = R(4) O(5) = R(4) O(6) = R(5) O(7) = R(5) O(8) = R(6) O(9) = R(7) O(10) = R(6) O(11) = R(7) CASE 6, 7 O(0) = R(0) O(1) = R(1) O(2) = R(2) O(3) = R(3) O(4) = R(4) O(5) = R(4) O(6) = R(5) O(7) = R(5) O(8) = R(6) O(9) = R(6) O(10) = R(7) O(11) = R(7) END SELECT FOR I = 0 TO 7 O(I) = O(I) OR &H80 ' *** The following line is the one I mean *** IF V AND &H20 AND ((V AND 3) = 1 OR (I > 3 AND (V AND 2) = 2)) THEN O(I) = (O(I) AND &HFE) OR (I AND 1) NEXT I FOR I = 8 TO 11 IF V AND &H10 THEN O(I) = O(I) OR &H80 ELSE O(I) = O(I) OR &H40 NEXT I IF V AND &H20 THEN FOR I = 8 TO 11 SELECT CASE V AND 15 CASE 0, 7 O(I) = O(I) AND &HFE IF I AND 1 THEN O(I) = O(I) OR 1 CASE 4, 3 O(I) = O(I) AND &HFE IF I AND 2 THEN O(I) = O(I) OR 1 CASE 8, 15 O(I) = O(I) AND &HFE CASE 12, 11 O(I) = O(I) OR 1 END SELECT NEXT I END IF PRINT #1, FNHEX$(V); FOR I = 0 TO 11 PRINT #1, FNHEX$(O(I)); NEXT I PRINT #1, NEXT V CLOSE
But maybe I have made another mistake in this program, which I haven't noticed. It seems to be the same as meaning, it only passes PPU A10 through if the register is used for multiple 1K banks. Perhaps this is what is actually meant by the article text, although it is a bit unclear (maybe it should say, "2 KiB banks (i.e. if one register is used twice) pass PPU A10 through", but I wait for your advice on this). --Zzo38 (talk) 12:35, 10 February 2014 (MST)
Which emulator support?
Can you please tell me which emulator support all of the features of the $B003 register of VRC6? --Zzo38 (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (MST)
- None (as of the time I signed this). Having a test ROM is probably a prerequisite. —Lidnariq (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2014 (MST)
- Someone who has a VRC6 cartridge could try to do it, perhaps. (I may be able to write a test ROM myself, but it won't be useful (at least at first) since I have no way of testing it, although perhaps the results could be compared with the table above as a kind of partial testing.) Furthermore, what are PPU addresses $3xxx mapped to on VRC6? --Zzo38 (talk) 02:10, 10 February 2014 (MST)
- There's no justifiable reason to care what PPU addresses $3xxx are mapped to, and so we did not measure. —Lidnariq (talk) 11:13, 10 February 2014 (MST)
- I am one that does care. It would be necessary, if someone tries to write a program to access $3000 in PPU, and then you have to know how to emulate such a thing (maybe it is the same as $2xxx, which is what it is when no extra logic is controlling it, but I don't know). --Zzo38 (talk) 12:35, 10 February 2014 (MST)
- There's no justifiable reason to care what PPU addresses $3xxx are mapped to, and so we did not measure. —Lidnariq (talk) 11:13, 10 February 2014 (MST)
- Someone who has a VRC6 cartridge could try to do it, perhaps. (I may be able to write a test ROM myself, but it won't be useful (at least at first) since I have no way of testing it, although perhaps the results could be compared with the table above as a kind of partial testing.) Furthermore, what are PPU addresses $3xxx mapped to on VRC6? --Zzo38 (talk) 02:10, 10 February 2014 (MST)
- I just the $b003 features to bizhawk, but given how weird they are, and the fact that there are no ROMs that actually used them, I couldn't say that they work for sure without a test ROM. Natt (talk) 11:53, 15 February 2014 (MST)
- The implementation at [1] appears to be incomplete. --Zzo38 (talk) 13:19, 15 February 2014 (MST)
- Here's a test rom. Bizhawk (latest SVN) passes it, FCEUX fails predictably. It shouldn't be considered accurate until it's been run on actual VRC6 hardware. Also, it's the first thing I've ever written for NES, so who knows what's broken on it. [3] Natt (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2014 (MST)
SRAM at $6000-$7FFF ?
The document makes a reference to a PRG RAM enable flag at bit 7 of register $B003. Perhaps an entry for it should be added in the Banks section. At least one game (Madara) seems to rely on reading/writing to this region to maintain save points, so it would be reasonable to conclude that this region is not volatile PRG RAM but SRAM. It is also unclear what happens with SRAM when PRG RAM flag is not set - are writes to SRAM ignored and reads return open bus? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colinvella (talk • contribs)
- Plain iNES1 headers cannot specify whether a game has PRG RAM that is not battery backed. And unfortunately NesCartDB is currently down so I can't just say "X% of games have no PRG RAM, Y% have PRG RAM and no battery, Z% have at least one PRG RAM with a battery"...
- PRG RAM that is not battery backed is just treated like the in-NES RAM: stays across warm boots, lost on a power cycle.
- In any case, for the VRC6, the two m26 games have battery-backed PRG RAM, and Akumajou Dracula has none. —Lidnariq (talk) 23:42, 30 July 2016 (MDT)
VRC6 and $B003 bit 5
In the edit history comments:
the specific banks used when bit 5 is clear are a function of banks 6 and 7, so you may end up with one-screen or "backwards" vertical instead, also - Lidnariq
- Oh! I misunderstood when I said vertical was forced, I mistakenly thought PPU A10 was passed, not the internal register LSB. Isn't it arbitrary then, not just vertical/1-screen? - Rainwarrior
- Not fully arbitrary. If we're just talking about the standard 8 1 KiB banks mode (i.e. ([$B003] & 3) == 0), then you can get 1scA, 1scB, H, V, "backwards" H, and "backwards" V, depending on [$B003] & 4 and the specific lsbits of R6 and R7.
- Full arbitrary mirroring control only comes from using the modes where ([$B003] & 3) == 1 —Lidnariq (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2018 (MST)
- So: arbitrary 2-nametable arrangements only in the most wasteful of all modes, where half your CHR is duplicated 1k pages? Would there ever be a good reason to leave bit 5 clear, or is it basically useless? - Rainwarrior (talk) 18:45, 10 March 2018 (MST)
- Bit 5 is left clear and used with Mode 1 when using 512 KiB CHR-ROM, by connecting VRC6's A10-A17 to CHR-ROM's A11-A18 and PPU's A10 to CHR-ROM's A10. There is no wasting of space for normal pattern data in this arrangement, but you are wasting half of each 2 KiB bank if you are using ROM nametables, as the last page of the Japanese VRC VI data sheet indicates. The current test ROM does not test that way of connecting the chip and thus may lead to false conclusions. NewRisingSun (talk) 19:39, 10 March 2018 (MST)
- Is the datasheet available somewhere? The first reference link on this article is now dead, unfortunately. - Rainwarrior (talk) 20:43, 10 March 2018 (MST)
- I try to use the wayback machine but while it has the forum thread archived, all of the documents are dead hotfile links. :( - Rainwarrior (talk) 20:46, 10 March 2018 (MST)