Talk:TxROM: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→ysxlmq ygrlbu rhpvv: new section) |
m (Reverted edits by 199.15.233.162 (talk) to last revision by Lidnariq) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
AFAIK, TFROM existed only with 128 KiB PRG and 32 or 64 KiB CHR. If the table is for reproductions, why not use a denser format? If it's to document reality, why does it say things that are untrue? Regardless, a legend at the top would be nice. Also, when I made [[JxROM]], I assumed this was documentation, not interchangeability guidelines.—[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 16:06, 26 March 2013 (MDT) | AFAIK, TFROM existed only with 128 KiB PRG and 32 or 64 KiB CHR. If the table is for reproductions, why not use a denser format? If it's to document reality, why does it say things that are untrue? Regardless, a legend at the top would be nice. Also, when I made [[JxROM]], I assumed this was documentation, not interchangeability guidelines.—[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 16:06, 26 March 2013 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:50, 3 June 2016
On all the board variants tables why do we say things like:
| TFROM | 128, 256, 512 KiB | 16, 32, 64 KiB ROM | Supports fixed mirroring |
AFAIK, TFROM existed only with 128 KiB PRG and 32 or 64 KiB CHR. If the table is for reproductions, why not use a denser format? If it's to document reality, why does it say things that are untrue? Regardless, a legend at the top would be nice. Also, when I made JxROM, I assumed this was documentation, not interchangeability guidelines.—Lidnariq (talk) 16:06, 26 March 2013 (MDT)
