Talk:Projects/current: Difference between revisions

From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Reverted edits by 87.106.27.11 (talk) to last revision by Lidnariq)
Line 2: Line 2:


Can we bump the "homebrew" section so it's above the "demo" section? I would think that current homebrew would be more popular than the older tech demos. --[[User:Drag|Drag]] 22:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Can we bump the "homebrew" section so it's above the "demo" section? I would think that current homebrew would be more popular than the older tech demos. --[[User:Drag|Drag]] 22:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
== Equity Trust New Zealand ==
Equity Trust New Zealand
I have a hard time finding a provider of offshore company formation.  One guy from another forum suggested Equity Trust in New Zealand. But I've never cosidered New Zealand as a jurisdiction for my offshore company, because it is not cheap and located so far. On the other hand, when every country is creating antioffshore policies, it is important to work in jurisdiction, which is not considered as offshore. So what do you think about it?

Revision as of 07:33, 3 August 2014

I don't think the new format is appropriate. I see what you want to do, to try to show what is the project and description but to me it feels more like cluttering the visual than anything. I think the previous approach was simple and obvious enough. We should revert to the previous design. Banshaku 01:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Can we bump the "homebrew" section so it's above the "demo" section? I would think that current homebrew would be more popular than the older tech demos. --Drag 22:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://www.nesdev.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Projects/current&oldid=15573"