Talk:NSFe: Difference between revisions

From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


:Many people who make NSF covers already put both in the existing artist field, or use the Copyright field with it, often prefixing the cover artist with "cv:". Since in NSFe there is no length limit on the strings in the "auth" chunk there's plenty of room for multiple names in there already. People have suggested a lot of extra fields to add, but I personally just think this makes UI implementation for it annoying, which is why  I just added a "text" field instead where any arbitrary information could be added and displayed at the author likes. Currently only NSFPlay will show it, and only in the infobox window, though I plan to make a breakout window for it so you don't have to scroll through that tiny box to see it. As for the Jaleco-JF-13 sound board, that's been kinda low priority to me for pretty obvious reasons (i.e. only used in one game, not for music, only for baseball gameplay sounds, lack of implementation details, scarcity of ROM, unrippable ROM, etc.). - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 08:05, 27 January 2013 (MST)
:Many people who make NSF covers already put both in the existing artist field, or use the Copyright field with it, often prefixing the cover artist with "cv:". Since in NSFe there is no length limit on the strings in the "auth" chunk there's plenty of room for multiple names in there already. People have suggested a lot of extra fields to add, but I personally just think this makes UI implementation for it annoying, which is why  I just added a "text" field instead where any arbitrary information could be added and displayed at the author likes. Currently only NSFPlay will show it, and only in the infobox window, though I plan to make a breakout window for it so you don't have to scroll through that tiny box to see it. As for the Jaleco-JF-13 sound board, that's been kinda low priority to me for pretty obvious reasons (i.e. only used in one game, not for music, only for baseball gameplay sounds, lack of implementation details, scarcity of ROM, unrippable ROM, etc.). - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 08:05, 27 January 2013 (MST)
: I never did get an explanation as to how providing the ability to customize the built-in VRC7 instruments is a good thing. Would you humor me? —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 17:36, 2 February 2013 (MST)


Furthermore, another suggestion for "mixe" chunk which tells the volume and panning of each channel, specifying the ratio of the master volume with the maximum volume that the channel can have. Another chunk is "MULT" which combines multiple files into one; each record is an address and length of the ROM data (within the "DATA" block) corresponding to each one. The "INFO" and "BANK" data are copied the same number of times each within their chunks, so if the first block specifies 5 songs and the next 2 songs, then songs 0 to 4 are using the first ROM address/data and INFO and BANK headers, while the songs 5 and 6 use the second one and subtracts 5 to write the accumulator initially. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 16:21, 2 February 2013 (MST)
Furthermore, another suggestion for "mixe" chunk which tells the volume and panning of each channel, specifying the ratio of the master volume with the maximum volume that the channel can have. Another chunk is "MULT" which combines multiple files into one; each record is an address and length of the ROM data (within the "DATA" block) corresponding to each one. The "INFO" and "BANK" data are copied the same number of times each within their chunks, so if the first block specifies 5 songs and the next 2 songs, then songs 0 to 4 are using the first ROM address/data and INFO and BANK headers, while the songs 5 and 6 use the second one and subtracts 5 to write the accumulator initially. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 16:21, 2 February 2013 (MST)
: re: "mixe" I'm a little wary of providing features that can't be implemented in hardware: as long as we assume a 2A03 as the sound generator (and if not, why does this belong in a '''N'''SF specification?), grouping mixing by "both square waves", "triangle, noise, and DPCM", and "expansion" would be something I could defend, but more fine-grained panning/volume control seems untrue. (I guess the sole exception would be I also see an argument for "individually pan-able and volume-control-able channels of the 5B", because we know it's identical to a YM2149F.)
: While your NSF combiner has evidently been greatly useful, I find myself a little troubled "MULT" turning NSFe into a almost-general archive format… —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 17:36, 2 February 2013 (MST)

Revision as of 00:36, 3 February 2013

chunk suggestions

Suggestion for "auth" chunk: Add extra fields for composer of original and composer of cover. Another suggestion, for "vrc7" chunk: Specify the VRC7 built-in instrument settings which this file is meant to be played (there are a few different patch sets due to inaccuracy, and some might intend certain ones to sound better as they were written). Also suggestion a "JF13" chunk, which if it exists, contains ADPCM encoded audio, which is controlled by a register at $7FFF. --Zzo38 (talk) 03:22, 25 January 2013 (MST)

Many people who make NSF covers already put both in the existing artist field, or use the Copyright field with it, often prefixing the cover artist with "cv:". Since in NSFe there is no length limit on the strings in the "auth" chunk there's plenty of room for multiple names in there already. People have suggested a lot of extra fields to add, but I personally just think this makes UI implementation for it annoying, which is why I just added a "text" field instead where any arbitrary information could be added and displayed at the author likes. Currently only NSFPlay will show it, and only in the infobox window, though I plan to make a breakout window for it so you don't have to scroll through that tiny box to see it. As for the Jaleco-JF-13 sound board, that's been kinda low priority to me for pretty obvious reasons (i.e. only used in one game, not for music, only for baseball gameplay sounds, lack of implementation details, scarcity of ROM, unrippable ROM, etc.). - Rainwarrior (talk) 08:05, 27 January 2013 (MST)
I never did get an explanation as to how providing the ability to customize the built-in VRC7 instruments is a good thing. Would you humor me? —Lidnariq (talk) 17:36, 2 February 2013 (MST)

Furthermore, another suggestion for "mixe" chunk which tells the volume and panning of each channel, specifying the ratio of the master volume with the maximum volume that the channel can have. Another chunk is "MULT" which combines multiple files into one; each record is an address and length of the ROM data (within the "DATA" block) corresponding to each one. The "INFO" and "BANK" data are copied the same number of times each within their chunks, so if the first block specifies 5 songs and the next 2 songs, then songs 0 to 4 are using the first ROM address/data and INFO and BANK headers, while the songs 5 and 6 use the second one and subtracts 5 to write the accumulator initially. --Zzo38 (talk) 16:21, 2 February 2013 (MST)

re: "mixe" I'm a little wary of providing features that can't be implemented in hardware: as long as we assume a 2A03 as the sound generator (and if not, why does this belong in a NSF specification?), grouping mixing by "both square waves", "triangle, noise, and DPCM", and "expansion" would be something I could defend, but more fine-grained panning/volume control seems untrue. (I guess the sole exception would be I also see an argument for "individually pan-able and volume-control-able channels of the 5B", because we know it's identical to a YM2149F.)
While your NSF combiner has evidently been greatly useful, I find myself a little troubled "MULT" turning NSFe into a almost-general archive format… —Lidnariq (talk) 17:36, 2 February 2013 (MST)