Talk:Emulator tests: Difference between revisions
m (Reverted edits by 61.135.179.167 (talk) to last revision by Lidnariq) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: The BRK bit ''does not exist''. P is a ''six-bit'' register, and the other two bits only have defined values when in the stack. In this case, any of 0xCF, 0xDF, 0xEF, and 0xFF are valid values for the fictionalized eight-bit version of P. —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 16:06, 24 July 2013 (MDT) | : The BRK bit ''does not exist''. P is a ''six-bit'' register, and the other two bits only have defined values when in the stack. In this case, any of 0xCF, 0xDF, 0xEF, and 0xFF are valid values for the fictionalized eight-bit version of P. —[[User:Lidnariq|Lidnariq]] ([[User talk:Lidnariq|talk]]) 16:06, 24 July 2013 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:12, 26 September 2013
The http://blargg.parodius.com links are broken (e.g., instr_test-v3.zip). --Ulfalizer 21:30, 17 January 2013 (MST)
- They'll remain broken until slack.net comes back. --Tepples 06:38, 18 January 2013 (MST)
Breaking out the "Hard-to-emulate games" section into its own page might be nice. While they make good "emulator tests" in a sense, there's no indication that you'll find them here. -Ulfalizer (talk) 14:20, 1 April 2013 (MDT)
The Nintendulator log for the nestest.nes file appears to contain inaccuracies. For example, line 103 (opcode 0x28: PLP) should pull 0xFF from the stack and set the processor status to 0xFF, but as you can see in the next line, the processor status is 0xEF. This is wrong according to sources such as visual6502, e-tradition, and obelisk's 6502 reference -- a random contributor at 129.120.53.184 15:33, 24 July 2013 (MDT)
