Talk:Program compatibility

Passive-aggressive

How is this any more passive-aggressive than Game bugs? --Tepples (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2015 (MDT)

It's passive-aggressive because you have a direct way of dealing with the problem that raydempsey had a bug in his in-development game. I think it's quite rude to put it on a list like this given the situation. He's still working on it! Your edit said "namin' and shamin'", I presume as a joke, but I think it's an accurate description of what it was effectively doing. This is completely different than enumerating bugs in long-dead software by people who are not members of this community.

Yes, you did let him know directly on the board. That part was good. In light of this your actions weren't passive-aggressive as a whole. I was really just referring to the act of putting up a public notice about someone's bug, which by itself is a rather rude and passive-aggressive way of telling them to fix their software.

The other entries on the list are probably fine/useful. - Rainwarrior (talk) 21:21, 28 July 2015 (MDT)