Talk:Nestech.txt errata: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(What's even the purpose of this page?) |
m (the errate is not even understandable without having the document under the eyes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What is even the point of this page? It is an awful mix of a description of a document and an errata of the said document. I'd say if you want to do errata it belongs to the [errata] page, or much better, @Koitsu, update your document to release a new version that fixes the current inaccuracies (it's never too late, and for historical reason, I belive your doccument is great, *much* better than this wiki). | What is even the point of this page? It is an awful mix of a description of a document and an errata of the said document, that is not understandable if you don't have the document below the eyes. I'd say if you want to do errata it belongs to the [errata] page, or much better, @Koitsu, update your document to release a new version that fixes the current inaccuracies (it's never too late, and for historical reason, I belive your doccument is great, *much* better than this wiki). | ||
Describing the document in the wiki could make sense, but then it would make more sense to describe many document in one page, or else the number of page dedicated to document descriptions will grow very large. | Describing the document in the wiki could make sense, but then it would make more sense to describe many document in one page, or else the number of page dedicated to document descriptions will grow very large. | ||
[[User:Bregalad|Bregalad]] ([[User talk:Bregalad|talk]]) 08:15, 27 May 2015 (MDT) | [[User:Bregalad|Bregalad]] ([[User talk:Bregalad|talk]]) 08:15, 27 May 2015 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:15, 27 May 2015
What is even the point of this page? It is an awful mix of a description of a document and an errata of the said document, that is not understandable if you don't have the document below the eyes. I'd say if you want to do errata it belongs to the [errata] page, or much better, @Koitsu, update your document to release a new version that fixes the current inaccuracies (it's never too late, and for historical reason, I belive your doccument is great, *much* better than this wiki).
Describing the document in the wiki could make sense, but then it would make more sense to describe many document in one page, or else the number of page dedicated to document descriptions will grow very large. Bregalad (talk) 08:15, 27 May 2015 (MDT)
