User talk:181.48.80.122: Difference between revisions
From NESdev Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I haven't seen problems in Chromium, which uses the same engine as Opera. What error do you see? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 21:19, 4 February 2016 (MST) | :I haven't seen problems in Chromium, which uses the same engine as Opera. What error do you see? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 21:19, 4 February 2016 (MST) | ||
::Given the summary for the original edit was "Vancouver Real Estate House", I suspect this was just an attempt to look human in order to get approval to edit pages (and fill them with spam)... --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] ([[User talk:Quietust|talk]]) 09:22, 6 February 2016 (MST) | ::Given the summary for the original edit was "Vancouver Real Estate House", I suspect this was just an attempt to look human in order to get approval to edit pages (and fill them with spam)... --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] ([[User talk:Quietust|talk]]) 09:22, 6 February 2016 (MST) | ||
:::Could be. But only an account qualifies for autoconfirmed status. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] ([[User talk:Tepples|talk]]) 14:57, 6 February 2016 (MST) | |||
::::''We'' know that. The spambots, however, do not. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] ([[User talk:Quietust|talk]]) 07:20, 7 February 2016 (MST) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:20, 7 February 2016
FYI, your website doesn’t seem suitable in Opera.
- I haven't seen problems in Chromium, which uses the same engine as Opera. What error do you see? --Tepples (talk) 21:19, 4 February 2016 (MST)
