Talk:Projects/current

I don't think the new format is appropriate. I see what you want to do, to try to show what is the project and description but to me it feels more like cluttering the visual than anything. I think the previous approach was simple and obvious enough. We should revert to the previous design. Banshaku 01:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Can we bump the "homebrew" section so it's above the "demo" section? I would think that current homebrew would be more popular than the older tech demos. --Drag 22:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Over the internet Style Mall, the globe major boutique clothes sale, clothing solutions,Web based style brand

Clothing brand "addiction" come from? Lately, the international environmental organization Greenpeaces most recent report, "Tong river pollution - global brand childrens clothes toxic and dangerous residues Survey" (hereinafter known as "residual Report") noted, Adidas (Adidas), Burberry (Burberry), Disney ( All Disney) as well as other 12 international brands of childrens clothing toxic and damaging substances are detected. The report said that the detection of more than a single third with the samples developed inside the detection rate of China, toxic and hazardous substances up to 96.6%. Greenpeace demands the quick elimination of those brands employed in its provide chain and emissions of toxic and hazardous substances. Dyeing hyperlink vulnerabilities reported to Greenpeace in May very well 2013 to June period in 25 countries and regions procurement of 82 children and infant clothing samples include things like Adidas, Nike, Puma, Disney, H & M, Uniqlo 12 well-known brands, all samples were sent to a third party has been certified independent laboratory for analysis testing. The results showed that all brands are detected toxic substances. 61% of the samples detected nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPE). Samples plastisol printing has 94.3% contain phthalates, and childrens apparel and footwear products with waterproof function in all detected perfluorinated compounds (PFCs). It is understood that reproductive toxicity of phthalates could affect the development of reproductive organs, and reduced sperm count and infertility related, you can enter the body through hand contact with the mouth, on the threat to young children and pregnant women are particularly worthy of attention. Industry experts have said that nonylphenol (NP) and before this substance caused widespread concern plasticizers, are added during the production of chemicals, will cause harm to human reproductive health. Although this material on clothes can wash off, but after entering the water body will continue to affect the environment, thus becoming health risk factors. It is reported that, after the "Greenpeace" has repeatedly issued similar inspection data. In 2012, the organization in order to raise peoples awareness, special arrangements organized a so-called "toxic fashion show" in Beijing, China, to attract people to its alleged case of two-thirds of clothing products contain toxic substances. The organization has been pushed to 2020 roughly zero emissions of harmful substances goal apparel merchandise. In fact, in recent years, in fact, environmental organizations disable clothes NPE, phthalic acid esters, such as the voice from the material had been there, but the domestic apparel industry has been difficult landing. "NPE and phthalates mainly in dyeing and printing sectors." An apparel industry experts stated, is now on Chinas textile industry, is still difficult to do without a lot of dye, a single is based on the high cost of using alternative dyes, Alternative options are also other less dye. "Not only China, Southeast Asia along with other nations do not actually disable NPE within the apparel industry, etc.." In addition, some analysts have pointed out, it will probably also relate to the issue of trade barriers. "In fact the degree of harm that may possibly not be to the extent of such Sudan damaging, but may want to eat a huge amount of egg yolk a day with Sudans only possible damaging." There environmentalists urged the government to alot more stringent standards should formulate relevant regulations and policies, as soon as a public blacklist and phase-out schedules of toxic and hazardous substances. It also demands Burberry, Adidas and also other brands as soon as possible to make non-toxic commitment to effectively eliminate toxic and hazardous substances, and public use and emissions information and accept public supervision in order to prevent further accumulation of toxic and hazardous substances inside the rivers, threatening the environment and human health. Adidas "addiction" is worth noting that some leading brands to poison also been detected in the detection of residues of toxic substances. E.g., high ionic concentration and volatile H & M perfluoro compound contained in the pants; Uniqlo waterproof jacket in volatile perfluoro compound; shoes C & A in a high concentration of NPE; Puma sneakers subject high concentrations of organic tin. In fact, so far, 18 well-known enterprises commitment will achieve the objective before January 2020 zero emissions of toxic and hazardous substances. Which, like Mango and Zara and other brands have begun to publish their emissions of toxic and hazardous substances information provider, but there are brands such as Adidas did not make any commitment to real action, still lacks a detailed plan practicable, also refused to consumer disclose their emissions of toxic and hazardous substances supplier information. But, this was detected toxic brands, Adidas and also other brands is not the first on the list. In August 2011 report released "fashion poison 2: poison hidden in clothes - worldwide brand clothes toxic and dangerous substances residual survey", Greenpeace stated the survey found, Adidas, Li Ning and other famous international brands of clothes and shoes , applied within the production process NPE. Within the detection of a year later, Adidas again list. In August 2012, Greenpeace test report still shows 14 Adidas sportswear brand, there is a material made use of in the health and environmental dangerous chemicals perfluorinated compounds (PFC) and so on. After exposure, Adidas is quick to clarify that say then than sing nicely Adidas public commitment in their public statements: will phase out its provide chain and products all toxic and hazardous substances in 2020, and will take action eliminated immediately environmental hormone substances NPE (nonylphenol ethoxylates). But a year later, this "non-toxic inside the future," the brand is life and life but a slap inside the face to fans. Some experts believe that "effective and credible companies have committed to poison should gradually achieve zero discharge of toxic substances in 2020 as the goal, and contains the following: core principles, information disclosure and comprehensive elimination of" core principles in this part of the business should be detailed clearly define the precautionary principle, zero emissions of damaging substances, the responsibility of individual enterprises and the publics right to know. Experts have pointed out, replace old varieties with higher toxicity of green dye apparel industry "anti-drug" is the only way. According to reports, at present, there are already chemicals manufacturers can provide safer alternatives, the cost can be kept flat with toxic chemicals. Therefore, I hope Adidas and also other manufacturers to use safer alternatives.