Talk:Program compatibility: Difference between revisions
Rainwarrior (talk | contribs) |
Rainwarrior (talk | contribs) (→Compatible and Incompatible: new section) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:The other entries on the list are probably fine/useful. - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 21:21, 28 July 2015 (MDT) | :The other entries on the list are probably fine/useful. - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 21:21, 28 July 2015 (MDT) | ||
== Compatible and Incompatible == | |||
I'm not sure I understand the utility of the three categories. I think the approach taken by [[Game bugs]] is better. We should just be listing bugs in homebrew games, possibly with categorization by the nature of the bug. | |||
The compatible category seems pointlessly incomplete. There is a great deal of homebrews software that should be considered "compatible". I would also suggests that all software has bugs; we just haven't found bugs in these ones yet. ;P I get that the word "compatible" is supposed to refer to emulators vs. hardware, but that's a moving target. Every emulator is different. | |||
What does "incompatible programs" mean? Crash on boot? I'm sure each of these games has a different reason for failing to run. It's mildly useful to have a list of software that shouldn't be expected to run on a good emulator, but this form is rather poor information. | |||
On a related note, does anyone else get occasional black squares in the world background when running the Super Bat Puncher demo on their PowerPak? I've always thought it had a bug, but I never tracked down what it was. - [[User:Rainwarrior|Rainwarrior]] ([[User talk:Rainwarrior|talk]]) 21:33, 28 July 2015 (MDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:33, 29 July 2015
Passive-aggressive
How is this any more passive-aggressive than Game bugs? --Tepples (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2015 (MDT)
- It's passive-aggressive because you have a direct way of dealing with the problem that raydempsey had a bug in his in-development game. I think it's quite rude to put it on a list like this given the situation. He's still working on it! Your edit said "namin' and shamin'", I presume as a joke, but I think it's an accurate description of what it was effectively doing. This is completely different than enumerating bugs in long-dead software by people who are not members of this community.
- Yes, you did let him know directly on the board. That part was good. In light of this your actions weren't passive-aggressive as a whole. I was really just referring to the act of putting up a public notice about someone's bug, which by itself is a rather rude and passive-aggressive way of telling them to fix their software.
- The other entries on the list are probably fine/useful. - Rainwarrior (talk) 21:21, 28 July 2015 (MDT)
Compatible and Incompatible
I'm not sure I understand the utility of the three categories. I think the approach taken by Game bugs is better. We should just be listing bugs in homebrew games, possibly with categorization by the nature of the bug.
The compatible category seems pointlessly incomplete. There is a great deal of homebrews software that should be considered "compatible". I would also suggests that all software has bugs; we just haven't found bugs in these ones yet. ;P I get that the word "compatible" is supposed to refer to emulators vs. hardware, but that's a moving target. Every emulator is different.
What does "incompatible programs" mean? Crash on boot? I'm sure each of these games has a different reason for failing to run. It's mildly useful to have a list of software that shouldn't be expected to run on a good emulator, but this form is rather poor information.
On a related note, does anyone else get occasional black squares in the world background when running the Super Bat Puncher demo on their PowerPak? I've always thought it had a bug, but I never tracked down what it was. - Rainwarrior (talk) 21:33, 28 July 2015 (MDT)
